Cognitive empathy isn’t agreement or forgiveness – it’s a conflict tool that helps you stay calm, spot solutions, and de-escalate by understanding what drives someone’s behavior without absorbing their emotions.
The story
Why empathize with an enemy? Are we just handing out free forgiveness coupons?
After 20 years of studying, teaching, and writing about empathy, here’s my take: empathy isn’t agreement, and it isn’t excusing harm. It’s a conflict tool. It helps you stay regulated, cool things down, and spot exits you can’t see when you’re locked into trying to “win.”
In mediation terms, I’m talking about *cognitive empathy*: stepping into their perspective *without taking on their emotions*. You track what they want, what they’re afraid of, and what story they’re telling themselves – without soaking up their mood like a sponge. This overlaps with emotional intelligence: once you can name what’s driving their behavior, you can choose a response that de-escalates instead of escalates.
Try this in a tense conversation: let them talk. Then reflect back what you heard was hard for them, and check that you got it right. No interrupting, advising, or defending. That one move turns “enemy” into “a human with needs,” and suddenly the problem starts looking more solvable.
If you want the full method, I laid it out in Chapter 16 of *A Practical EmPath: Rewire Your Mind* on Amazon, including the PEP approach and de-escalation steps you can use in real rooms – not a fantasy world where everyone’s calm.
Recent Comments