After decades of coding and building AI solutions, I learned that picking the right LLM isn’t about finding “the best one” – it’s about matching each tool to the right job and knowing how to use them properly.
You can actually change how you experience time – not by doing more, but by slowing down inside through presence and cognitive empathy to make life feel less chaotic.
Ever feel like time is slipping away? Discover how cognitive empathy doesn’t just help you understand others – it actually slows down time and makes you present.
You know that feeling when someone gives you directions with total confidence – and you end up at a dead end? That’s AI coding assistants in a nutshell.
After years of AI prompting, I’ve figured out the key question: when do you keep tweaking versus starting over? Here’s my framework for knowing which approach works.
After 30 years of coding, I learned the secret to getting useful work from AI: break problems into small chunks instead of dumping everything into one prompt.
30 years watching AI projects fail because consultants build systems instead of workflows that work for real people. I teach teams to think differently about automation – solving actual problems, not imaginary ones.
Your AI gives mediocre answers because you’re asking it to solve complex problems all at once. Break tasks into smaller chunks instead – like building a web scraper, then analyzing data, then generating a report separately. Each piece gets the model’s full attention and drastically improves quality.
Most leaders think AI is just chatbots, but they’re missing 3x efficiency gains. After 30 years building AI workflows, I’ve learned the best systems understand people, not just data.
Breaking complex AI tasks into smaller chunks gets way better results than asking it to solve everything at once. Here’s my 30-year coding process for decomposition prompting.
After 30 years of coding, I’ve seen workflows evolve from rigid rule-based systems to adaptive AI agents that make real-time decisions and optimize themselves.
30+ years of coding taught me every tech wave was overhyped. AI is different – it’s not automating tasks, it’s making entire workflows obsolete and reshaping what’s possible.
We’re optimizing workflows that AI has already made obsolete. After 30 years of coding, I’ve learned AI doesn’t speed up old processes – it replaces them entirely.
I learned that forcing positivity actually pushes people away and makes problems worse. When we dismiss struggles with “stay positive,” trust breaks down and real issues get buried.
I spent 30 years watching companies waste money on AI tools that employees hate. The failures aren’t technical – they ignore how humans actually work and think.
After 30 years of coding, I learned the secret to AI success: treat agents like a specialized team, not magic wands. Break problems down, write clear prompts, give them tools.
30 years of coding taught me: one AI agent is useful, but a team of specialists working together changes everything. Most people miss this completely.
Developers treating AI like a teammate instead of a search engine are pulling ahead. The gap isn’t about better models—it’s about learning to delegate effectively through skills like prompt engineering, modularization, and workflow integration.
AI code looks perfect but feels wrong? After 30 years coding, I’ve learned the most valuable skill isn’t getting AI to write code – it’s knowing when to ignore it.
Most teams fail at AI because they treat it like a magic button instead of a team member. Here’s how to actually build effective AI workflows that save time.
After 30 years of coding, I cracked AI agent teams by treating them like junior developers – clear jobs, specific prompts, and one supervisor to keep everything clean.
Stop hunting for the perfect AI assistant. Build a specialized team instead. Multiple focused agents working together beats one do-everything bot every time.
Building AI agent teams isn’t about the tech – it’s about organization. Like any project team, you need specialists with clear roles, the right tools, and proper management.
After 30 years of coding, I learned AI delegation isn’t about losing control—it’s about humans and AI doing what they’re best at. Most teams waste time on repetitive work that AI should handle, but you need the right system.
Most people use AI like a search engine instead of a teammate. After 30 years of coding, here’s how to delegate to AI like you would any developer and get brilliant results.
After 30+ years coding, I’ve learned when AI assistants are confidently wrong – which happens more than you think. Here’s how to catch their mistakes and use them effectively.
30 years coding, 8 with AI: The real skill isn’t getting AI to write code – it’s knowing when to ignore its confident answers. AI hallucinates with authority.
After 30 years in software, I learned that working with AI isn’t about the tool – it’s about developing the right skills. Clear prompts, breaking problems into chunks, careful delegation, and treating AI like you manage people makes all the difference.
Your AI coding assistant’s confident answers might be dead wrong. After 30 years of coding, here’s how to spot the red flags before your code breaks in production.
Companies waste six figures on AI tools that sit unused because they focused on what the tech can do instead of what humans actually need. The real efficiency gains come from mapping your team’s workflow first, then building AI around that.
Recent Comments