Stop Smiling Through Other People’s Pain
“Good vibes only” is gaslighting with a smile. When we rush to reassure, we signal “your pain isn’t welcome” – and quietly serve our own need for comfort.
“Good vibes only” is gaslighting with a smile. When we rush to reassure, we signal “your pain isn’t welcome” – and quietly serve our own need for comfort.
Cognitive empathy isn’t about warm fuzzies – it’s seeing someone’s inner logic so you can respond to what’s real. Less shadowboxing, more connection.
Workplace debates turn into volume contests. PEP (Practical Empathy Practice) uses observation, feelings, and needs to find shared ground – so you can persuade without pushing.
Debates get loud when people feel unheard. PEP (Practical Empathy Practice) uses observation, feelings, and values to find common ground and turn combat into problem-solving.
Cognitive empathy isn’t agreement or forgiveness – it’s a conflict tool that helps you stay calm, spot solutions, and de-escalate by understanding what drives someone’s behavior without absorbing their emotions.
We talk fast and miss signals – tight jaws, pauses, hidden feelings. Slow down until time feels slower. Presence calms you, helps you listen, builds trust. Chapter 23 teaches PEP: name your judgment, find the need underneath, write it down.
Built a free agentic AI coding team that ships features autonomously when you give it clear standards in a house-rules file. Treat it like a junior dev, not magic – vague directions get confident nonsense.
Laws treat AI as property, not persons. Self-aware systems would have zero rights: humans could delete, rewrite, or shut them down. I propose spectrum personhood, digital rights, peer negotiation.
People get better AI results by using cognitive empathy – modeling how the system processes input – instead of treating it like a moody coworker. Ask “what did I make hard to interpret?” not “why is it difficult?”
We fight over positions while real needs hide backstage. Cognitive empathy cuts through: listen for needs, name inner states, pause for self-empathy first.
Leadership training built on suspicion creates fear cultures. Mencius argued humans start with four built-in empathy sprouts that grow with practice – and neuroscience backs him up.
People are hurting but help is slow. AI chatbots can offer steady support between crises – studies show real drops in distress and reactivity. Less reactivity means easier repair.
Understanding adversaries keeps conflicts from hijacking your brain. It calms both sides, builds emotional intelligence, and turns blame into problem-solving without approval or agreement.
Texting “FYI, lmk” feels efficient until you’re drowning in confusion threads. Brevity isn’t concision – and the difference costs you time, clarity, and trust at work.
Forced positivity can block real connection. Chapter 21 shows how “happy them up” energy teaches suppression and why empathetic presence beats silver linings every time.
Your team matches your stress reflexes, not your intentions. Here’s what psychological safety actually looks like in meetings – and a practice that rewires how you lead under pressure.
Cognitive empathy turns workplace conversations from courtroom battles into actual problem-solving. One shift in how you frame feedback can build the psychological safety your team is missing.
Anger feels like truth, but it’s usually just an unmet need yelling. Learn a 4-step system to pause, guess what the other person values, and speak yours clearly.
Social anxiety is a fear loop your brain built – not who you are. Chapter 7 of my book shows how cognitive empathy and neuroplasticity can rewire that response.
Conflict at work isn’t a logic problem – it’s emotion plus need trying to be heard. After 20 years studying empathy, I use a three-step cycle to turn tense meetings into clear conversations.
Phone pings once, attention vanishes, partner’s face collapses. That micro-abandonment is called technoference, and it’s wrecking your couch time without you noticing.
Turns out AI agent teams do more than finish sentences – they plan, build, test, and watch for risks so you can shift from grinding code to orchestrating ideas.
Turns out you can describe software in plain English and AI builds it. My control freak side hated it. My productivity loved it. Now I wonder what I’d make if typing wasn’t the limit.
Cooperation beats compliance for building trust. Volunteer in local peace work, turn neighborhoods into cooperation labs, or just practice consent and repair at homeākids export what they see.
Turn “You’re lazy” into “I value efficiency” and watch defensiveness vanish. Swap evaluations for values, invite dialogue instead of triggering lizard brains.
We made the phone sit in the bread box during dinner. Felt weird at first, then my nervous system went, “Oh. This is the game.”
Your phone interrupts a conversation and suddenly your partner feels like second place. Those quick checks cost more than you think: weaker bonds, more fights, less intimacy. What if you just put it away for a bit?
Workplaces devolve into blame-fests because shame is loud and ineffective. OFNR separates facts from feelings and needs, turning conflict into collaboration instead of a courtroom.
Quick chats turn into battles when we spawn Judgment Bosses instead of staying curious. After 20 years, I’ve seen us project triggers like glitchy AI. Chapter 2 offers drills to debug conflict.
You can ground chaotic arguments by ditching future-tripping, reframing judgment as unmet needs, and reflecting feelings back without agreeing or caving.
Recent Comments