After 30 years of coding, I learned AI delegation isn’t about losing control—it’s about humans and AI doing what they’re best at. Most teams waste time on repetitive work that AI should handle, but you need the right system.
The story
After three decades of coding and eight years building AI solutions, I’ve learned something counterintuitive: delegating to AI agents isn’t about giving up control. It’s about building a system where humans and AI each do what they’re best at.
Most teams waste time on repetitive work – testing, formatting, basic research. That’s exactly what AI agents should handle. But here’s the catch: you can’t just turn them loose and hope for the best.
The teams I mentor see real efficiency gains because they treat AI delegation like good engineering. They modularize tasks into clear, promptable chunks. They write prompts like code – specific, testable, refinable. They assign specialized agents to specific roles: one reviews code, another handles documentation, another prototypes.
The skill isn’t technical wizardry. It’s knowing how to break down a business problem and explain it plainly. If you can do that, you can harness AI.
But oversight matters. I teach a player-coach model: humans monitor outputs, validate quality, and escalate when needed. You’re not managing people anymore – you’re architecting workflows where AI handles the grunt work and humans focus on strategy, creativity, and relationships.
Start simple. Map your workflow. Identify the repetitive tasks draining your team’s time. Build a prompt library. Create review protocols. Turn your AI agents into actual team members, not just tools you occasionally use.
This isn’t optional anymore. As AI becomes standard in every workflow, these delegation skills are the new baseline for high-performing teams.
Recent Comments