I thought empathy could never be manipulative until I realized I’d been using my own empathy practice to get my way. Here’s how I learned to spot the difference.
The story
I used to think empathy was this pure, untouchable force that could never harm anyone.
Then someone accused me of using my own Practical Empathy Practice manipulatively. My first reaction? Complete defensiveness. How could a system built on genuine connection possibly be twisted into manipulation?
But here’s the uncomfortable truth I had to face: I myself had used PEP to manipulate someone.
That realization became the foundation for Chapter 22 of my book, where I explore this dark side that nobody wants to talk about.
Before I understood manipulation:
– I’d disguise my strategies as needs: “I really need you to cook dinner” [putting pressure through false urgency]
– I’d make requests that weren’t really requests – where “no” wasn’t actually acceptable
– I’d focus on getting my way rather than genuine understanding
After developing anti-manipulation awareness:
– I learned to separate needs from strategies: “I’m hungry and tired. Are you up for cooking?” [honest feeling plus real request]
– I started asking myself the crucial question: Before I open my mouth, am I trying to understand this person or secretly hoping to change them?
– I built safeguards into my practice: owning my feelings, seeking consensus not compromise, and trusting my intuition about authentic consent
The most powerful shift? I developed a sixth sense for when something feels genuinely consensual versus subtly coercive. You can feel the energy behind people’s words when you’re practicing with integrity.
Any communication tool can be weaponized. But when you stay honest about your intentions and understand the difference between needs and strategies, empathy becomes what it was meant to be – a bridge to genuine connection, never a weapon for getting your way.
Recent Comments