Breaking AI tasks into specialized agent teams—each handling research, drafting, or review—often beats dumping everything into one prompt. Cleaner output, faster results, lower cost.
The story
When I dump one big task on an AI, it can get weird.
When I split it into roles, my brain gets time.
When each agent takes a chunk, the chaos gets cleared.
When the team runs in parallel, the results can climb.
I’ve been playing with a simple idea that keeps paying rent: stop treating AI like a solo genius, start treating it like a *team sport*. Break the problem into chunks, hand each chunk to a different AI agent, then let an orchestrator stitch the work back together.
This is what “agentic AI” or “AI orchestration” looks like in the wild, including a free, customizable “coding team” template I found that assigns roles like Planner, Architect, Coder, Tester, Reviewer. You prompt once, it delegates, and the agents collaborate in a shared workspace until it converges.
What’s interesting is how closely this matches common orchestration patterns:
– *Concurrent orchestration*: fan out in parallel, then aggregate, great for reducing latency.
– *Handoff orchestration*: agents pass work to specialists dynamically.
– *Hierarchical orchestration*: a manager agent decomposes, delegates, iterates, backtracks.
Skills that seem to unlock the “most of AI” part:
1] Clean task breakdown: research → draft → edit, mapped to strengths.
2] Human-in-the-loop: I review before final synthesis, because reality exists.
3] Model budgeting: cheap models for simple chunks, premium reasoning models for the thorny bits.
Can you imagine treating your next hard project like a tiny org chart instead of a single prompt?
Recent Comments